In this era of big data, leaders often worship data and ignore rationality.xxiii Data-first approaches unfortunately influence “data-inspired” decisions more often than “data-driven” ones. As Turing Award winner and prominent causal AI researcher Judea Pearl said: “Data are profoundly dumb. Data can tell you that the people who took a medicine recovered faster than those who did not take it, but they can't tell you why.”xxiv
A “data-inspired” approach led officers to the wrong question about armor placement in World War II. Wald found a better answer because he modeled the environment and relationships that created the data set. Without knowing where data comes from, descriptive stats are just a snapshot. Executives that use data for decisions without the discipline of a framework risk making the same mistakes.xxv
Organizations are awash in data and generate exponentially more every day. The harsh reality is that most of this data is irrelevant to decision making.
Unfortunately, most organizations don’t have the right data for making decisions. Starting with data leads to fitting decisions to data that is available. This imposes artificial constraints on the scope of the problem and reduces the efficacy of the decision process—if it doesn’t eliminate it entirely.xxvi
Companies jump to data before they know what data a decision requires, says Pratt:
The decision framework model helps determine what data to incorporate. A well-designed decision model identifies uncertainty and where to add data. When making decisions, it takes away arbitrary limitations based on available data, directs leaders to acquire the most valuable data, and saves valuable time and resources when acquiring, cleaning, and managing irrelevant datasets.xxviii
Hyper-focus on data often crowds-out decision making, as Pratt explained:
Figure 7 Starting with the data may be seen as pragmatic but is misguidedxxix
DI requires good decision making and good decision-making processes. A framework is more important than more data when turning ML predictions into decisions, especially if automation is involved. ML can scale bad decisions just as effectively as it scales good decisions.xxx